There are no comments yet for this card (or rating). Be the first!
it is a huge shame it has somoning sickness. but it a blocker too. i can see it being usefull, and i see it being horrible. it all depends on the hand and the play. personally as long as i get an additional forest in my starting hand with this i have no problem playing it turn 2 and attacking for 3 with my rogue elephant, doesn't slow me down too much... meh i'm sure even with 4 they wont be drawn early game as often as my forests anyway.
Posted By:
Dohyden
(2/6/2010 7:00:08 PM)
wonder why they didn't release this for all colors.
Posted By:
applecorn
(1/22/2010 5:03:31 AM)
One of the Worldwake preview cards makes every land you control indestuctable.
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(1/21/2010 11:40:08 PM)
I love Dryad Arbor just because of how absurd it is. Sadly, I don't consider it to be all that useful. It uses up your land drop for the turn, and the fact that it's also a creature makes it much more vulnerable to removal. Dryad Arbor would be a lot more useful and fun if it didn't suffer from summoning sickness.
Posted By:
Loozar402
(12/23/2009 1:58:08 PM)
The symbol in the top left corner must be the one for land creatures.
Posted By:
Zarcron
(12/5/2009 7:38:01 AM)
Landfall anyone?
Posted By:
GrimGorgonBC
(12/3/2009 9:29:44 PM)
hmm not too sure how i feel about this a bit weird but i see how it could be a major advantage
Posted By:
spacechaser0001
(11/9/2009 1:11:09 PM)
Weird design, really. Maybe they could expand upon this.
Posted By:
Designer_Genes
(10/26/2009 10:37:31 AM)
I don't like how it still has summoning sickness. Makes for a bad turn 1 play, but otherwise it seems like a great card.
Posted By:
ObsessedAddict
(10/18/2009 4:51:53 PM)
I think land creatures are a possibility for what the new thing in Worldwake is. Literally, the world awakens and now it's creatures. Maybe not, but I think there's a good chance.
Posted By:
klaff
(10/1/2009 5:03:27 PM)