For the time, this was fairly good. 6/6 for 7, monocolor casting cost, no problimatic upkeep costs? Not bad for, oh, a couple of years. Then large creatures got better.
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(3/16/2010 6:54:41 AM)
Its a Vizzerdrix with a more restrictive mana cost and a horrible downside. This card has not aged well.
Posted By:
ScissorsLizard
(5/3/2010 6:16:51 PM)
This has been errata'd to be a fungus!
Posted By:
Enchantment_Removal
(7/13/2010 2:52:52 PM)
I remember this card. The best one I ever had as a child. Back when every powerful creature had either cumulative upkeep, or just spend three mana every turn. A one-time cost was a pretty big deal. Plus he's mono-coloured, as someone already mentioned. I'd never play him now, but those were good times.
Posted By:
Tynansdtm
(12/11/2010 10:40:31 AM)
Playable in Shandalar actually. No reason to ramp into lord of the pit on turn two, is there? and those dragons are just going to ice storm your swamps anyway. So this guy aint bad. (in an environment with much worse to be had.)
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(10/18/2010 6:52:08 AM)
a double-colored 6/6 seven-drop with drawback?...there are enough better alternatives these days.
it has strangely creepy artwork only seen on old cards like this one, though.
Posted By:
Mode
(9/10/2009 6:39:49 PM)
Maybe if it was 5 mana and had Flample.
Anyway, the idea of a "Mold Demon" is pretty darn cool. Why, him and the Fungusaur are good buddies.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(7/11/2010 10:50:55 PM)
FUNGUS DEMON
Posted By:
MrPink343
(12/30/2010 12:59:08 AM)
Wow. A 7cc 6/6 that allows you to sac 2 swamps or it dies?
Sign me up.... for the failboat that is.
Ugh. I'm surprised Wizards survived printing tripe like this.
Posted By:
Zuul33
(10/26/2009 9:23:56 AM)
Not sure why this gets so much hate, since games were slower in the past and fatties were badly costed in general, to say the least. At least this doesn't completely wreck you, unlike Cosmic Horror, which keeps you tapped out until it blasts you in the face.
Posted By:
Auteur
(8/24/2010 2:48:36 PM)