Results
using...
  • Name
  • Types
  • Text

x Remember, you can comment on every printing. If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 4.191 / 5  (34 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Your Rating:
Your rating is how you rated the card and is factored into the player rating.
 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:  stars.
12 >
Combo this with Steamflogger Boss by changing "two" to "three" in order to have each of your Riggers assemble three contraptions!
Posted By: iandustrial (4/19/2009 12:04:00 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


The card reads one higher or lower. 1 can only become 0 or 2.
Posted By: kiseki (3/1/2011 12:17:46 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Aaron's Random Card Comment of the Day #35, 11/12/10

Many cards in the silver-bordered Unhinged set riff off of existing black-bordered Magic cards, but this one is a reference to a prior silver-bordered card from the Unglued set, Look at Me, I'm the DCI.

Whereas “the DCI” is a mysterious, shady front of an organization whose name used to be an abbreviation for something people no longer remember (and is now just a string of letters), “R&D” is a real, concrete body of actual humans, many of whom I have met. And R&D’s initials actually stand for something: Randy & Del.

Randy Buelher, former Director of Magic R&D, and his wife, Del Laugel, current Senior Magic Editor, are the first family of making Magic, so it makes sense that the department is named after them. The blue handwriting on this particular card is, in fact, Randy’s. (The red editorial markings on Frazzled Editor, also in Unhinged... (see all)
Posted By: Aaron_Forsythe (11/14/2010 10:48:26 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


How 'bout, combo this with Mana Screw for unbounded mana?!
Posted By: Ratoly (11/2/2009 8:10:47 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I have it on good authority that choosing "1 = 0" is a really, really bad idea.

I will withhold any further commentary for fear of having missed a joke.
Posted By: willpell (6/5/2011 3:54:18 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


THis plus greater morphling equals an all powerful creature
Posted By: DGice (8/17/2010 4:06:12 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


That's not a real Moat under it. New white mana symbols and Fifth Edition wide textbox don't work there. Someone laid it out using the Seventh Edition/Time Spiral version of the old frame and then dropped the sticker scan on top of it. Cute, but not quite "Randy gave up a Moat for this" cute.
Posted By: Annorax (6/16/2011 11:03:53 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Aww, Aaron . . . doesn't Darksteel Spork feel a little hurt by the snub?
Posted By: so.724 (11/15/2010 10:40:19 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I remember thinking this card took two mana, because on many older R and D cards the casting cost was listed as Number (total casting cost) and number of mana symbols. So 2WW would be the casting cost of white knight. That was a long time ago and this card is still good, mainly because of its many combo's (Uktabi Kong for infinite apes?)
Posted By: SentByHim (11/14/2009 12:42:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


"1 equals 20 and Shower of Sparks... POW"
-DarkCerberusXX

You'd want to use a shock or bolt, as your shower of sparks would cost 20 too. Just saying. x.X
Posted By: KarmasPayment (1/17/2011 4:18:04 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 



Recent Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:  stars.
12 >
Choose 1 goes to 0. Play training grounds.
Posted By: CogMonocle (11/15/2013 9:47:41 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Could work in black-bordered Magic, aside from the massive rules-bending it would do. Maybe in another 5 years?
Posted By: Lord_Ascapelion (8/18/2013 9:07:25 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Run four. Change 1 to 2, then change 2 to 4, then change 4 to 8.

Now you can change any number to any other number 8 higher or lower than that number. Or change 8 to 0, just to break the last three cards you played...
Posted By: Megadog (6/10/2013 12:22:15 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I choose 487 and 486. For all those people who like overkill, your Pygmy Giant is now USELESS!
MWUAHAHA!!!
Posted By: Ruelguy (2/25/2013 12:53:59 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


What if you name 0 and then -1? Can I cast a Summoner's Pact and have it give me 1?
Posted By: Paragalor (2/5/2013 2:44:11 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Nice reference to "Look at me, I'm Sandra Dee" from Grease. Pretty obscure though.
Posted By: Morgaledh (8/25/2012 9:27:29 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I'm on a Moat!
Posted By: Totema (1/30/2012 11:49:39 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


That's not a real Moat under it. New white mana symbols and Fifth Edition wide textbox don't work there. Someone laid it out using the Seventh Edition/Time Spiral version of the old frame and then dropped the sticker scan on top of it. Cute, but not quite "Randy gave up a Moat for this" cute.
Posted By: Annorax (6/16/2011 11:03:53 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I have it on good authority that choosing "1 = 0" is a really, really bad idea.

I will withhold any further commentary for fear of having missed a joke.
Posted By: willpell (6/5/2011 3:54:18 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


The card reads one higher or lower. 1 can only become 0 or 2.
Posted By: kiseki (3/1/2011 12:17:46 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0