x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.402 / 5  (41 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12 >
Not bad at all, 4/2 for 3CC in red isn't bad people.
Posted By: BrutalJim (3/12/2010 4:10:10 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Is it just me, or is the flavor text reminiscent of the flavor text on a Pokémon card?
Posted By: Polychromatic (5/13/2011 11:38:37 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Not bad at all for casual play. Solid offensive capability for a common, IMO.
Posted By: Paleopaladin (3/12/2010 3:23:08 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


3/1 for 3 is okay. 4/2 for 3 is great.
Posted By: Test-Subject_217601 (12/7/2010 12:02:55 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


The old Pokemon cards had flavor text.
Posted By: NeoKoda (10/13/2011 4:45:11 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It wasn't flavor text, it was Pokedex entries D:
Posted By: Kryptnyt (11/7/2011 1:19:26 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Yeah, but then it wouldn't be Gruul enough. It's not meant to be that great anyways.
Posted By: RisingMoon (7/27/2009 1:47:42 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


should be 2/2
Posted By: sweetestsadist (11/29/2008 5:54:57 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


A 4/2 for 3 mana is okay, but if it can even be a 3/1, it's a bit underpowered.
Posted By: BALDOF (12/12/2009 8:06:54 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Pokemon cards had flavor text?
Posted By: Robface (5/31/2011 5:21:54 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0