x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 4.361 / 5  (420 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
<<  1112131415 > >>
This card is absolutely disgusting. I can't tell if I'm more bitter about how ridiculously overpowered this chump is, or the fact that I opened two boxes of Innistrad and didn't rip a single one :(

Posted By: bowlofgumbo (1/29/2013 8:06:05 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


How much snap could a snapcaster cast if a snapcaster could cast snap? We all know the answer to this one. That said, I'm hoping for either a Rapcaster or Sasscaster Mage in the next Un-Set. Reusing old jokes almost as little fun as flashbacking mana leaks.
Posted By: SpaceMagic (5/5/2013 8:12:10 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@Lifegainwithbite
I never said that Eternal Witness wasn't a good card- it's a fantastic card.
I was only saying that Snapcaster is better for most decks, which you apparently agree with:
"This is only good for blue decks that are built around it."
Posted By: strider24seven (5/22/2013 1:42:03 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Is there a certain spell that you have that you have that your deck is built around? Why have 4 when you can have 8!

I bought 2 of these for 12 dollars at a time where the minimum price everywhere else was 20 dollars. I pulled my first one from one of the first booster packs I ever bought. I decided I had to complete my playset and bought my fourth one for 20 bucks.

Now someone please go win a vintage tournament with this bad boy so I can see a nice return on my investment.

Posted By: ojchahine6 (5/30/2013 2:24:04 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@pipikako

Funniest comment ever
Posted By: patronofthesound (6/23/2013 2:14:32 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Looks a little like Chow Yun-fat!
Posted By: Buenomars (9/29/2013 1:39:22 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Everyone's getting all mad at wizards for printing this. "Should have been red," say some. "Shouldn't have been a creature," say others.

But it wasn't wizards' fault. Tiago Chan designed this card.
Posted By: FlingIt (3/1/2014 11:57:49 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@ hypa_dude

I disagree with everything you say. Snapcaster is exactly what modern blue decks need. This isn't the blue of vintage and legacy. Modern blue is nothing close to being as oppressive. Sure he's in every deck that can run him, but without him, blue is a sad color in modern. He is actually enabling so many different archetypes by making blue worth playing. And what blue creatures are better than Tarmogoyf? What blue removal is as efficient and versatile as Path to Exile? What blue sweepers are better than Wrath of God and Damnation?
Posted By: danagelh (5/2/2014 5:03:19 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


guys. guys. he isn't actually THAT insane in standard...

it's the things he could do in legacy that'll be interesting.
edit: although the banning of Mental Misstep was actually a blow to his playability. I mean. getting to pay 1u for a 2/1 and misstepping someone AGAIN? that is just totally brutal.
Posted By: greg2367 (9/22/2011 7:53:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I don't like this at all.. it just seems so "auto-include" if you're running any form of blue control. I imagine he will be almost as common as stoneforge mystic was before the ban.. why wouldn't you want a 2/1 flash for 2 that lets you reuse your spells?!
Posted By: Revelation666 (9/23/2011 11:52:36 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 




We have updated our privacy policy. Click the link to learn more.

Gatherer works better in the Companion app!

Continue