I think I'll stick to my good ole fashioned Terror .
Posted By:
J_Lennon
(12/27/2010 7:21:23 PM)
Apparently every non black creature only deserves 0.5/5 because every single deck that anyone has ever made irrespective of colour has four of these in it.
Using that rationale, all black creatures only rate 0.5/5 if you run this with Scuttlemutt.
Yeah it's a very useful card but it's not in every deck so get over it guys.
Posted By:
Concerned_Bystander
(3/1/2011 2:33:32 AM)
Should cost 1, target black creatures as well, and also exile. Oh wait, they gave the good removal to white.
Posted By:
Mudbutt_on
(8/8/2010 10:25:51 AM)
*sings the Doom song*
Posted By:
GruesomeGoo
(8/10/2010 11:41:20 PM)
Snuff Out FTW
Posted By:
TheMoustacheCame
(7/11/2010 9:12:18 PM)
dies to mana leak
Posted By:
rinoh20
(4/13/2011 4:57:26 PM)
I'm appologize for my disapproval, but any card with color based restrictions is out of the question for me. There are way better removal cards out there. Path to Exile, Rend Flesh, Boomerang, and even Sudden Death to name a few. Personally I believe (and have learned from over 12 years of MTG playing experience) if you're playing solid black removal, you're probably losing pretty badly.
You would think black makes the best removal, but this is only true when its paired with white or blue. Aside from that, all your opponent needs is a black creature and you're done for.
Not as good as Counterspell. However its better than Terror.
3/5
Posted By:
BloodJunkie
(12/31/2010 12:02:29 PM)
This is your state of the art black removal against none-black. The interesting question is what removal you sideboard against black. Quack sickness works fine i think, any suggestions?
Posted By:
Sironos
(9/22/2010 2:28:13 AM)
Way too good. And if they print a color restriction on a card, give opposing colors a choice to interact with it.
Posted By:
Cheza
(8/9/2010 11:40:43 AM)
Should read: "Target nonblack creature can't attack or block, because it's f*cking dead. Suck it white."
Posted By:
VoidedNote
(2/7/2011 10:19:11 PM)