If it had haste or was a 2/1 it would be great, but otherwise there are much better options for a turn 1 goblin.Raging Goblin
Posted By:
Polkovnik_Skyfox
(5/9/2011 11:55:06 AM)
@mode: great idea. I even like the name "bellicosity". R&D listen up!
Anyways, ever see a card and feel they must have made a typo? This card SCREAMS 2/1, or even 1/2 to be honest. At least that would make it interesting. Ideally I'd make this a 1/2 with haste and "bellicosity" :D
Posted By:
Wulfsten
(6/1/2011 2:20:24 PM)
Suckish. Reminds me of Duelmasters's Deadly Fighter Braid Claw
Posted By:
Duskdale_Wurm
(6/9/2010 12:17:01 AM)
"Bro, I found the perfect recruit for your army, Krenko"
"Nicol Bolas, he can't control himself... And I think he just pooped himself"
"Ha! Yeah, he does that. But don't worry about it! I mean, when have my gifts ever backfired?"
"Well, that last goblin you gave me died... and one of our mountains is now a crater."
"Wow! I didn't expect that! Well, good luck with this guy!"
Posted By:
Ferlord
(6/3/2013 6:26:53 AM)
I have a feeling that it was originally a 2/1 for 
with the drawback, but it ended up testing too strong in limited. So they did a last minute change. And historically last minute changes in development tend to be horrible ones.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(3/27/2013 3:23:20 AM)
Why was this printed?
Posted By:
Condor_96
(8/6/2011 10:59:51 PM)
Hey, at least he's a Goblin people. Imagine if he were a Human Warrior X.X
Posted By:
boneclub
(6/14/2010 4:17:31 PM)
Still great as a bluff card.
Posted By:
NeoMint
(2/10/2011 7:18:21 PM)
This was printed to boost Mons's Goblin Raiders' self esteem.
Posted By:
luca_barelli
(10/24/2011 3:37:45 PM)
I fail to see the problem with this card. If you put it in a Goblin deck, it doesn't matter. You attack every turn with all of your goblins anyway. Why does it matter?
Posted By:
StoneEvolution
(11/23/2009 4:27:59 PM)