Once again this card demonstrates that White is color of Pacifism effects and Blue has to pay 2-3 more mana to do that exact same thing. The color pie tries to allocate abilities to each color but I dont see why Blue can't have Pacifism for 3 mana instead of paying 5 like this piece of turd.
Posted By:
vantha
(2/1/2013 10:47:59 AM)
It would be better if it didn't cost all the manas.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(11/28/2010 5:46:00 PM)
The lowest rated non-creature blue card. . . lol
Posted By:
blink182zombies
(1/8/2011 3:23:19 PM)
Couldn't you almost take control of your opponent's creature for 5?
Posted By:
kuzimu
(4/1/2009 1:41:40 PM)
I like these cards BUT IT COSTS SO MUCH it makes me sad
Posted By:
Shiduba
(6/27/2010 7:57:55 AM)
lol, wizards what was the guy coming up with the mana cost smoking? I want some
Posted By:
OutlawD1
(10/8/2009 8:06:27 AM)
For creatures, I like Shackles better.
Posted By:
nammertime
(12/16/2009 10:25:27 AM)
better than Psychic Overload but costed higher accordingly. This is ok i guess. I would rather just have Dehydrationand risk the artifact or Psychic Overload and get Card advantage or at least a 1 for 1.
Posted By:
Shoe2
(11/14/2008 1:37:34 PM)
You could simply Doom Blade something, but that's SOOO main stream. You could use Day of Judgement, but you don't want YOUR things to die, do you? You could maybe use Persuasion to simply take it the creature for yourself, but do you want that filthy thing in your house? Certainly not!
The solution? An extremely convuluted and mana expensive, ahem, "removal" that uses mana that could have been spent on, say, ANYTHING ELSE! Such as Unsummon, making your opponent pay for it again. But if you're running this card, chances are you see absolutely no problems with whittling all your mana and can't understand how that's a bad thing.
Posted By:
Dolorosa
(1/12/2012 9:17:33 AM)
Waaaaay too expensive. One of the lowest-rated blue cards ever printed for a reason.
Posted By:
Aquillion
(3/10/2013 11:54:08 PM)