x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 4.682 / 5  (33 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
Someone obviously didn't like the art. Maybe they felt lilypads weren't evil enough for black.
Posted By: Bluehero (5/21/2010 12:21:33 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Um... why doesn't this have a 5/5? It's a SWAMP!
Posted By: Hibron (5/7/2010 4:07:24 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Of course, there's a reason for that.

It's in Lorwyn. All the swamps in Lorwyn were as pretty as all the plains were grim in Shadowmoor.
Posted By: NoobOfLore (1/4/2011 5:44:08 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Where are the ducks?
Posted By: divine_exodus (4/23/2011 7:52:12 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Am I the only one who noticed that the 3 "cutest" looking Swamps from Lorwyn (290, 292, & 293) have the wrong image? The card images don't match the data (and artists' names) printed on the right.

This one show's Steve Prescott's Swamp, but has data for the one by Fred Fields.
Posted By: Cybertronian (1/11/2012 3:15:41 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It's nice to see a pretty looking swamp.

Black gets a bad reputation as the 'evil' colour, and it's not. Swamps in the multiverse are not all full of rotting bodies and rats; why would they be?

Playing with a black deck, drawing a swamp like this is a breath of fresh air.
Posted By: thought_jar (9/19/2013 8:08:24 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0