x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 1.714 / 5  (42 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
12 >
Less Lovecraft and more Giger. But yes, this art is pretty well wasted.
Posted By: ROBRAM89 (4/24/2011 10:36:46 AM)


Should have been a 13/13 for 13 with some insane 13-related ability. Oh well, a lost opportunity i suppose :\
Posted By: Crag-Hack (7/31/2011 11:30:35 PM)


How delightfully Lovecraftian.
Posted By: Kirbster (11/13/2010 9:03:05 PM)


Agreed, it also has excellent flavor text...
Posted By: Guest57443454 (11/25/2009 8:22:41 PM)


The casting cost is too high.
But Mark Tedin did an awesome artwork job here.
Posted By: Mode (2/23/2009 4:42:17 AM)


For a name like this, I'd expect some terrifyingly huge creature with a corresponding drawback. Instead... regeneration?
Posted By: Auteur (1/14/2010 8:29:27 PM)


This card is just despicable. Cost BB or something instead of sacrificing a Swamp and it's pretty good, though still off-flavor.
Posted By: SleetFox (3/14/2010 4:24:54 PM)


This would make for a wicked tattoo other then that pretty horribad
Posted By: storm_crow4presidnt (4/22/2010 7:22:18 PM)


I love this card. I mean, I know it's a complete piece of garbage, but that art may just be one of my favorites from Legends.
Posted By: Detonativity (11/20/2010 4:08:57 PM)


the art, name, and mechanics should all be taken apart and given to different art, name, and mechanics. this doesn't look nearly big enough to be a Horror of Horrors, unless you make it a HORRIBLY Spike Effect that just plain Castrates Target Player and feeds their balls to them. :P
Posted By: DarthParallax (10/29/2013 10:05:43 AM)


Gatherer works better in the Companion app!