@ Aaron:
Another post that uses a personal experience and overextend it until it sounds like anyone agrees. If you would have skipped creature types completely, there wouldn't have been a problem. If you would have used Fungus+Saproling, no problem either.
The stupid part about this block was that the switch from race to class was an overdose. The split into a 2x2 block didn't really help.
@ Token:
Come on. If you think that you can get lost with a single token including a relevant creature type, you would have never ever allowed artifacts that produce "token" copies of other artifacts/creatures. How stupid is this? Or what about Chronozoa? Tokens with counters?
In my opinion, R&D should reduce this token stupidness to the minimum. Searching for a copy or Looking at the top X cards and pick one card that fulfills a certain statement is much cooler and much more flavorful... and this would never ever produce problems about "keeping track".
Posted By:
Cheza
(6/4/2011 7:09:37 AM)
Limited was fine. I read 95% of the content on this site and its rare, but sometimes it seems like you guys make up problems. It was Standard that was an issue. "Oh, you're playing Elves? Cool, good game."
Posted By:
The-D
(6/3/2011 2:19:13 PM)
Soooo much flavour!
Posted By:
Stray_Dog
(10/16/2010 5:29:42 AM)
Professor Oak
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(6/30/2011 2:30:01 PM)
This card inspired the Splicers, who add the new fun of both generating golem tokens and being golem lords.
Posted By:
bay_falconer
(6/8/2011 3:42:38 PM)
This looks like a job for Ambassador Pineapple...
Posted By:
universe34
(9/10/2011 8:46:07 PM)
Goes well with Bramblewood Paragon.
Posted By:
LordRandomness
(12/31/2011 3:56:15 AM)
@Aaron - Since when is 'Rocky and Bullwinkle' ancient? I would've used either 'Beany and Cecil' or 'Ruff and Ready'...
Posted By:
Alsebra
(6/4/2012 9:17:26 AM)