Lol what a weird card. Not any reason to play this. And the flavor is stupid
Posted By:
Shiduba
(10/3/2009 2:52:53 AM)
Bet Ogden Nash wrote this flavortext
Posted By:
Superllama12
(5/23/2011 4:38:50 PM)
Yes it is underpowered now, but in the earliest days, this was a solid five-drop for a green deck. Usually kept back for defense, but capable (at the time) on offense, too.
Posted By:
Ibn_Shisha
(6/30/2011 4:09:57 AM)
"Well, hello there. I'm a tree."
Posted By:
1maketoilets
(7/5/2011 10:19:04 PM)
Great; so for all that flavor text and one of the most notoriously underwhelming vanillas ever printed, all we got was a quick de***ion of a treefolk ejaculating. WHAT HAS BEEN READ, CANNOT BE UNREAD.
Thanks Wizards, for so horribly skewing my perception of brown sugar.
0.5 out of 5, for ruining my oatmeal. And tainting my candied bacon.
Posted By:
DaMaster012
(2/7/2012 1:03:00 PM)
ok....
Posted By:
Bogmire
(5/30/2012 4:21:36 PM)
When I look at this card, I fully expect it to start pelting apples at Dorothy, Scarecrow and Tin Man.
Posted By:
ChumleyX
(12/3/2012 5:55:39 AM)
Look ma'! No hands!
Posted By:
DaJoshMaster
(6/1/2013 4:30:59 PM)
There has always been a place for these kinds of defensive creatures. This was succeeded by Redwood Treefolk and more recently, Pheres-Band Centaurs.
Posted By:
Equinox523
(4/16/2014 8:11:59 AM)
Not a great creature in it's day but it was a high toughness blocker. At 5 mana, not sure if it's worth it over a Giant Spider but few other Green's blocked as big.
Posted By:
weasel_fierce
(6/2/2014 12:45:59 AM)