Those cards have nothing to do with each other, bluu.
Posted By:
kajillion
(8/23/2009 9:32:51 PM)
While this card has a lot of potential (a 5/5 for 3 mana without some pumping ability is pretty nice), it has to deal with requiring one of each basic land to be on the field. Which is problematic given that one of the main sources of mana fixing is to use dual and tri lands.
Compare it with Woolly Thoctar - you lose 1 toughness and get a stricter casting cost, but don't need to ensure you have one of each basic land in play.
Posted By:
JaxsonBateman
(1/15/2010 6:24:04 AM)
This card is great in my 5-color Naya Deck. He is almost always at 5/5
Posted By:
burnout97
(6/21/2009 4:25:50 AM)
I'm surprised this doesn't see play in Domain Zoo
Posted By:
Ajani_is_da_man
(1/16/2010 3:17:46 PM)
I can't be sure, but these might be great. It's tough to tell.
Posted By:
ZEvilMustache
(1/31/2009 5:09:55 PM)
Printed at common? seriously?
Posted By:
Esprel
(10/26/2009 9:35:26 PM)
What, no 300 jokes? I'm disappointed, Gatherer.
Why is it that Domain only seems playable on the cards that had to be Oracle-d to have it? I haven't seen and actual domain card I've liked. :-(
Posted By:
OmegaSerris
(7/13/2011 10:18:47 PM)
matca rioters $2.00
molimo, maro-sorcerer $5.00
blanchwood armor $1.50
building an unstopable deck.....PRICELESS
Posted By:
bluufrost
(6/17/2009 11:10:06 AM)
COMMON??!! WHAT THE F*** IS WITH THIS CARD?! 3 MANA FOR AT LEAST A 3/3 IN MOST CASES AND THEN IT JUST GETS WORSE FROM THERE! way to go wizards! green is the most overdone thing in the world!
Posted By:
kittyspit
(11/12/2009 12:27:34 PM)
Well actually kajillion, there's some weak synergy between them. I think that bluu most likely misread the card to read "number of lands you control".
Posted By:
Wusanderz
(10/20/2009 5:51:49 PM)