x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 2.444 / 5  (72 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
Love the flavor text.
Posted By: Nagoragama (10/7/2010 2:35:42 PM)


This guy is a feel-good kind of average. The kind of common that can go into a lot of casual decks, from U/W flyers and bird tribal to the artifact-support that he was meant for. Being a blue artifact also works great with Grand Architect
Posted By: Opined_Fluke (8/22/2013 7:49:47 PM)


I feel like they would need some other ability to be playable in constructed, but I'm not sure what.
Posted By: Galgus (7/21/2010 7:52:15 PM)


not bad but not good as well...
Posted By: GengilOrbios (5/16/2010 10:55:28 AM)


Not bad, definitely a solid addition to U/W. If you're playing U/W/B in an Esper deck, consider the Tower Gargoyle instead, as it is the same casting cost and gives you a stronger creature.

Posted By: Gaussgoat (4/11/2010 6:45:39 AM)


Very average, its a Hill Giant of sorts with flying

Posted By: Paladin85 (8/22/2011 12:30:47 AM)


Excellent card in limited, just add black and +1/+1 in constructed. Oh, or go green and give it trample. Eh, just add another white and get +1/+1 and vigilance.
Posted By: ZEvilMustache (1/31/2009 4:46:32 PM)


Cormorants Are Cool Glad That They Put Em On A Card Especially Artifact Style And Pretty Good In Conflux Draft
Posted By: MasterOfEtherium (7/31/2009 8:50:30 PM)


It's a functional card. 3/3 for 4 isn't too shabby. Obviously not for straight Esper (Tower Gargoyle is just too good to be removed), but if you were, say, running Bant/Esper, it makes a nice evasive beater for fairly cheap and can help monitor the skies for you. Totally limited fodder, but that's all right by me.
Posted By: DoragonShinzui (10/22/2012 1:37:08 PM)


3/3 flying for 4 is decent.
Posted By: TheWrathofShane (11/7/2012 7:58:40 AM)