WalletSlayer Angel = Normal
BankAccountSlayer Angel = Foil
Posted By:
Japster
(1/25/2010 4:12:09 AM)
I just have this image of someone using Form of the Dragon then getting slayed by baneslayer anger
Posted By:
PeterRabit
(11/4/2009 12:01:09 AM)
Very Powerful Card indeed. I pulled one out holo too from my first m10 pack. She's easy to summon not all that. I face two shivan dragons with her... and in the end lightning bolts just zapped her to bits. I dont see what all the racket is all about? She's powerful, but in these days a 1(b) doom blade gets gid of her like -that- or a terminate, (or in my case, 2 lightining bolts) etc... Powerful, but too powerful that it'll get killed. But when she dominates, she does indeed.
Posted By:
jdvue
(11/19/2009 12:57:52 AM)
Strictly worse than Pikemen, 1.5/5
Posted By:
ArtBell
(2/15/2010 6:58:20 PM)
I don't see the purpose of rating this low because it's too powerful. It most certainly is powerful. It most certainly was a mistake. It most certainly does neuter the game. That's all the more reason it deserves five stars. It's ridiculously powerful, and that's more than enough to deserve five stars.
Posted By:
SleetFox
(2/22/2010 9:55:56 PM)
This is ridiculous. Have they just run out of ideas and decided to just give up? These card designers need to start using their imagination instead of just packaging abilities together for low, low prices.
Posted By:
InsideousRakael
(5/5/2010 5:11:16 AM)
Stop complaining, it's not like you can't terminate this one, a bit overpowered and that's it.
Posted By:
RamzaFromIvalice
(12/16/2009 7:52:46 PM)
as NecroArTeest said
"baneslayer's lifelink, first strike and +1/+1 (not to mention pro demons/dragons) > serra's vigilance.
both die to removal. (removal excuse is invalid)
what is serra's advantage giving that it has the same cost as baneslayer?
it has none.
realistically serra = virtually useless.
baneslayer will replace it nine times out of ten.
aka power creep. "
I'm pretty sure liflink itself = vigilince because unless you're going to chump block you should have the same board position from it (attack = 4 (5 but this is ignoring the +1/+1 in order to look at the ability matchup) damage to opponent, +4 life, taken later as damage when opponent attacks, no creature loss... vs. attack for 4 damage, then block opponent and trade, both lose a creature and your net life is still the same) then you get bonus +1/+1, first strike, and pro demons/dragons just cuz
I think I'd hate this card less if Serra Angel wasn't in the set... but why wotc, why destroy a c... (see all)
Posted By:
MizoreIceQueen
(1/17/2010 12:18:30 AM)
Why isn't this a legendary creature? I might have been okay with it if it was.
Posted By:
Asic
(2/1/2010 9:20:46 AM)
I do agree that the card is too cheap, and I play alot of white decks, but the card is containable by means of the humble, and common, Oblivion Ring, or equally humble Doom Blade.
For those who say that the protection abilities are defunct because of the timing of the thing, I say this.
I have a casual deck that can have SIX dragons out on turn two.
That's right, 6 Dragons.
It is a rare occurance, but it happens, courtesy of Dragonstorm and four Dark Rituals.
The one time it happened, all 4 other players conceeded
Posted By:
Spideredd
(9/30/2009 5:40:54 PM)