Twincast. Because blue just didn't embarrass red enough, they had to go ahead and make a near-functional reprint of one of red's most iconic spells from the old days and make it blue.
Really classy, Wizards. At least we now have Reverberate to put it in the color that it belongs in.
Posted By:
JasonPaul601
(12/1/2012 9:22:33 PM)
Hi there. I'm beginner and my question is - how copying of spells works with spells with X mana cost such as Street Spasm? For instance if I cast it for 6 mana for overload cost and copy it using Twincast it deals 4 damage to all nonflying creatures?
Posted By:
arti87
(3/17/2013 3:14:03 PM)
Can somebody please answer this question.
We know copies of spells increased by X amt are copied exactly, but what about spells pumped by the number of lands you control.
If a spell does damage based on the number of mountains an opponent controls (not pumped by X) and you control no mountains, but apply twincast. Will it do the amount of damage your opponent was going to do to you or 0 damage (mono blue deck)?
Posted By:
illusion121
(6/2/2013 4:54:59 PM)
It is a shame they didn't reprint this into standard... I wanted to twincast Breaking // Entering to afford feeding my poor Consuming Aberration
Posted By:
Kaleidostorm
(6/14/2013 10:01:28 AM)
I maintain that this card should have been called spoon, since it's a blue copy of fork :P
Posted By:
Phillbato
(9/8/2013 2:58:59 PM)
Why is this better then reverberate? Force of Will.
Posted By:
Ligerman30
(9/9/2013 5:22:28 PM)
I feel really stupid asking, but is it possible to twincast a spell, then twincast that same spell again?
As in, I cast Traumatize, then Twincast it... can I then Twincast that same Traumatize again?
Posted By:
Travelsonic
(10/19/2013 9:22:33 AM)
Twincast is wincast!
...I'll see myself out now.
Posted By:
Continue
(5/11/2014 8:15:41 PM)