I would say "should cost one less" but then cancel would be obsolete. They should have made this more interesting.
Wizards, give us back the commands!!!!
Posted By:
Mamick
(4/15/2010 11:34:24 PM)
In duels this is strictly worse than Minamo's Meddling. which wasn't good.
Posted By:
theis999
(5/30/2010 1:22:34 PM)
Could have cost one less and made uncommon maybe? But Cancel has been printed way too much I guess.
Posted By:
AngelxLegna
(4/16/2010 8:37:19 AM)
@Mamick:" Wizards, give us back the commands!!!!"
Or Rewind !
Posted By:
True_Smog
(4/16/2010 1:44:39 AM)
Could have also allowed you to look at the top card of opponent's library as well. That wouldn't be too overpowered. But no, blue just has to have super expensive counterspells that have chintzy little bonuses...
Posted By:
Vinifera7
(4/19/2010 12:28:16 AM)
in other words counter target players spell then realize you should of waited ... AWESOME!!
Posted By:
__Silence__
(1/9/2011 10:04:13 PM)
I'd play this over Cancel. Cancel is no more of an early game counter than this one is, and the artwork on this card is much cooler. This card would have been remotely decent if it did look at the top of the controller's library in addition to their hand. But yeah, I might stick one of these somewhere 'cause knowing what's in your opponent's hand (if they have one) sometimes comes in hand- if I were running something like Venarian Glimmer.
Posted By:
Enchantment_Removal
(6/11/2010 10:05:41 AM)
Cool art. Not so great card.
Posted By:
lufia22
(6/26/2010 11:11:01 PM)
i really dont think looking at your opponents hand is worth it for 1 extra mana when u can just have cancel
Posted By:
F0zzy
(8/23/2010 7:27:24 PM)
Weak relative to older Counterspell, Mana Drain, etc but for a deck heavy with counterspells, knowing what is coming can be worth 1 mana compared to Cancel
Posted By:
Nighthawk42
(10/13/2010 7:27:28 PM)