It seems he'll always be a glory seeker and not a glory getter.
Posted By:
Sutebe
(4/9/2011 7:44:52 PM)
Well, it's not horrible.
Just incredibly boring. Then again, every card can't be barrels of awesome.
Posted By:
Deepfried-Owls
(5/24/2011 9:33:00 PM)
I was always confused as to why they printed Glory Seeker in Rise. For the next few weeks following the set's release, WIzards' home page was full of articles about how slow the format was designed to be, and as a consequence, how bad your typical Grizzly Bears were in that context. It was almost as if they didn't expect us to take their word for it.
Posted By:
scumbling1
(4/21/2011 5:44:42 PM)
It's a pretty solid card. Fine in pauper. But I love the flavor, just an adventurer who decided Ulamog's Crusher has crushed enough, and his Pathrazer has razed enough paths. Also, this from Onslaught was one of my first cards, so...nostalgia.
Posted By:
NeoKoda
(7/11/2011 5:10:11 PM)
Glory Seeker has been seeking glory since Onslaught, and has not found it yet.
Posted By:
The_Trendkill
(8/22/2011 7:59:05 AM)
@Lagus: It is incredibly boring indeed, but according to all these comments it's not a forgettable creature for sure. That's a pretty infamous fellow actually.
It's that kind of card everyone knows but no one wants to know.
Posted By:
Mode
(4/16/2010 9:29:03 AM)
Still searching, and now it is a woman !
Posted By:
True_Smog
(4/19/2010 11:42:27 AM)
I'm fine with them printing a 2/2 for 1W, but I'm not fine when they have Knight of Cliffhaven, a 2/2 for 1W that can level up in the same rarity in the same set. 1 out of about every 109 newbies who start with this expansion will open their first booster pack, find both, and be thoroughly confused. I guess being a soldier counts for something.
Posted By:
SleetFox
(4/16/2010 8:08:54 AM)
Always seeking glory but never getting it. Poor bear soldier.
Posted By:
Vedalken_Arbiter
(4/15/2010 10:38:35 PM)
I love the flavor text, it gets a 4/5 just for that, and for being a perfectly average card too I suppose.
Posted By:
RPGsr4me
(4/29/2010 1:09:38 PM)