so... it's killing a nest invader... why does it need 4 damage?
Posted By:
Gezus82
(5/31/2010 6:24:44 PM)
Because red really needs another way to kill my Platinum Angel?
Posted By:
Eved
(6/6/2010 1:37:37 AM)
I'm not seeing why everyone thinks this is better than bolt..it is decidedly not. a proper red burn or goblin deck relies on options, including the option of playing a burn spell during an opponent's turn, or on a creature OR player. This will still get some play here and there in some formats, but red decks will continue to prefer the temporal and target flexibility of bolt.
Posted By:
sancrosact
(6/18/2010 8:27:04 AM)
Just looooooove the artwork.
Posted By:
001010011100101110
(9/20/2011 12:52:44 PM)
I like how this is rated better than baneslayer but cost 120 times less.
EDIT: @scumbling1 you're right, i wrote this when i was first starting to play, my sincerest apologies.
Posted By:
steez4days
(11/20/2011 11:01:52 PM)
I don't think it should be an instant.
I do, however, think it should deal 5 damage instead of 4.
Posted By:
Blackworm_Bloodworm
(9/30/2012 3:43:25 PM)
Eh, not being instant doesn't both me much. Sometimes you need solid cheap damage to kill the things bolt can't kill, and when used with bolt you can take out toughness 7 and co.
I fight a lot of tribal decks, and there's so many +1/+1 buffs going around you need to be able to provide spells that can do more damage.
Posted By:
psychichobo
(10/24/2012 3:06:38 PM)
Hiiiyah!
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(11/27/2012 12:53:11 AM)
Compared to Lightning Bolt or Shock, it does 1 or 2 more damage, however it's a sorcery and can only target creatures. I think that puts this card in between them.
Posted By:
azure_drake222222
(1/31/2013 1:11:27 PM)
Holy shit this card is the picture opposite of banefire!Seriously go look at the artist is too.
Posted By:
kogar15
(2/6/2013 7:09:09 AM)