This would have been absolute fantastic if instead of destroying equipment the defending player controlled, it destroyed an artifact that said, it would probably have a much higher mana cost than {2} and probably a higher equip cost, since artifact are much more rampant in the game than just equipment.
...At least it's not as terrible as Rod of Ruin
Posted By:
tcollins
(5/15/2012 12:56:17 AM)
So is this thing wrapped in yellow caution tape or what?
But yeah, seems like a bad card in constructed, although a pretty good limited card.
Posted By:
mutantman
(1/29/2010 2:07:31 PM)
dissapointing
Posted By:
penguinmage25
(11/10/2011 4:28:36 PM)
yes the card is meh with an ability leaving much to be desired, but just remember the set coming out fall 2010...
Casual players around the world will find this card and start to troll all their friends who play white equipment in a few months.
It's not the best in for competitive purposes but I think that kitchen table magic players will look back at this fondly when rummaging through their collections in a few years.
Posted By:
Bigg_ol_FATTKIDD
(9/19/2010 4:15:50 PM)
I love the art and the flavour text. The ability is awesome too. I don't really see why it destroys only equipment though. I also don't know why this has such a bad rating. This card is awesome.
I also don't see why people think it's so over-costed. If it costed any less, it would be too good. Bonesplitter is undercosted. This card is well-balanced. It's downfalls are that the set it was printed in doesn't have many valuable targets, and anti-equipment is pretty niche.
Posted By:
SAUS3
(6/18/2013 10:50:41 AM)