Come ON guys. This is NOT worse than Razor Boomerang.
Posted By:
NARFNra
(12/11/2010 11:41:02 PM)
BULL
Posted By:
JFM2796
(7/29/2011 9:36:20 PM)
"Waah! This should have been..."
Cheaper? You want free?
+3? +4? It is what it is.
For infect, this is more akin to a proliferate, by adding extra poison.
Posted By:
JimT70
(3/29/2012 9:10:22 AM)
ah ha ha Distortion Strike oh wow.
it's a sad day when blue has a better combat card than red.
Posted By:
allmighty_abacus
(11/8/2010 7:21:08 PM)
But guys, "it could be good in limited", right? Isn't that the excuse everyone makes now to rationalize a system where about 75% of the cards you open in any pack go straight in the trashcan? Pretty sweet deal for Wizards - promote a format that requires players to constantly buy new packs, make so many of those cards useless that they'll never be able to build a constructed deck with them, AND have a convenient excuse for putting zero thought and time into a portion of the commons in every set. Bravo, Wizards, bravo.
Posted By:
achilleselbow
(7/10/2010 3:41:16 PM)
So in order to balance the power creep it is necessary to print cards that will never see play in any format? This card is so bad it makes me want to never buy packs again.
Posted By:
Vinifera7
(1/30/2010 8:50:31 AM)
There are times when I can justify the existence of a card despite its flaws. I can't do that here. This is seriously one of the worst cards ever printed.
Posted By:
Entropic_Acolyte
(5/11/2010 8:37:43 AM)
Man, this sucks.
Posted By:
Sironos
(5/19/2010 10:42:35 AM)
@True_Mumin
Asses are holy.
Posted By:
Duskdale_Wurm
(6/11/2010 6:49:35 PM)
This is so terrible, I would rather splash blue for a single Armored Cancrix. And, no, I'm not talking about Limited, I'm talking about Standard!
Posted By:
dberry02
(8/12/2010 2:17:09 PM)