Nice solid card for casual play
Posted By:
space-coyote
(2/19/2013 2:09:04 PM)
>implying the heart isn't a tangible part
Posted By:
LordRandomness
(5/18/2013 7:00:51 AM)
So... This thing curves pretty nice at 4/4 for 5 colorless. It has no Drawbacks and solid Tribal support. On top of the artifact shenanigans. It's Killer in Golem and artifact decks, Pretty good deal in 4/5 colored decks and still a solid creature in most other decks.
Pretty Solid if you ask me.
Posted By:
Smokey790
(6/15/2013 11:12:10 AM)
Not for constructed, unless we see some Golem love when we return to Mirrodin in the fall. But in limited, only green decks have something bigger at common.
Posted By:
ZEvilMustache
(7/8/2010 8:00:54 PM)
Works fine in a multicolor deck. 4/4 for 5 is not outrageous.
Posted By:
A0602
(7/8/2010 6:56:59 PM)
"good for limited? who cares"
Limited is where Magic brings in a majority of it's money. If you like this game, you should be greatful for healthy limited formats.
Posted By:
scumbling1
(5/3/2011 5:16:41 PM)
Why did the golem get stoned?
To take the Tectonic Edge off.
Posted By:
Test-Subject_217601
(10/15/2010 1:39:33 PM)
Could probably fit nicely into an Artifact deck with Etherium Sculptor and Mycosynth Golem. Otherwise, it's inferior to most of the other 5cmc and 4/4s you could be using.
Might see some more use in Scars, though.
Posted By:
Diachronos
(9/11/2010 7:14:46 AM)
A decent, solid card for limited. Should be a common, but I guess they didn't want every color to get common 4/4s for 5. I like the art and flavor text, as well.
I'm honestly surprised that it took this long for Magic to have a card named after something as classic as "stone golem," though.
Posted By:
Magnor_Criol
(3/1/2011 8:35:41 AM)
Not very good, but I'll play it in every Limited deck I can. It's a reasonably sized dude that you will be able to cast once you have 5 mana.
Posted By:
dudecow
(7/8/2010 12:55:49 PM)