If you don't like this because of it's lack of versatility, red is NOT your colour. This is a nuclear weapon with a time counter on it, if that doesn't get you going, don't play red burn.
Posted By:
Sironos
(8/25/2010 3:07:42 PM)
shes so hot...
Posted By:
Tokosan
(7/10/2010 7:28:50 AM)
Burrrn baby burn!
D-d-disco inferno!
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(7/11/2010 8:08:43 AM)
The only real problem I have about chandra is her +1 ability. It deals 1 damage to a player. Not very strong. But then again, if it did 2 damage, that would just be overpowered.
Otherwise, solid planeswalker.
Posted By:
dberry02
(8/2/2010 4:26:00 AM)
@superllama Yes, anything that says " to target player" can be redirected to Planeswalkers.
Posted By:
shadmed
(5/21/2011 9:37:55 PM)
I agree her +1 should nuke for 2 damage but i guess its to late for a change. Im running 2 in my burn for the flavor and win condition.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(5/8/2011 2:02:25 PM)
...6...7...8...CHANDRA HAS GONE SUPERNOVA!
Posted By:
Zenzei
(7/13/2010 1:16:18 PM)
I think people have such a low opinion of Nalaar because she's so predictable. Seriously, your choices are: Ping a player for 1, ping a creature for X, or nuke a player and all his/her creatures for 10. She's good, people just don't want a predictable Planeswalker.
Posted By:
Diachronos
(8/10/2010 3:45:08 AM)
The reason she is being hated is that she cost too much . .
If she costed 3 mana instead of 5 with reduced counters and reduced final ability, then she may fit in to a 'red' deck.
Posted By:
Hoonster
(4/23/2011 10:01:28 PM)
Perfect for a solid Bloodthirst deck.
Posted By:
Dr_Fletchers
(9/3/2011 8:00:09 AM)