Nice art, but I was hoping it would be Urza ripping somebody's head off.
Posted By:
spectermonger
(4/6/2010 7:58:58 PM)
well, mythic rarity was originally supposed to be based not on the playability of the cards but whether they were for lack of a better word "mythic," i.e. impressive, iconic, epic, etc.
Of course wizards has blatantly spit in the face of that. but there's the counter-argument regardless.
Posted By:
metalevolence
(7/13/2010 2:42:10 PM)
I love the alternate art on this card.
"I'll pay 12 to kick Urza's Crotch Beam."
Posted By:
GracefulInferno
(1/2/2011 8:49:00 PM)
duel deack win more: kicking a urza's rage on thier negator.
Posted By:
rinoh20
(4/9/2011 5:24:34 PM)
"This hand of mine glows of an awesome power! It's burning grip tell me to defeat you! Take this! My love, my anger, and all of my sorrow! SHINING FINGER!"
Posted By:
Aquillion
(6/11/2013 6:34:25 PM)
Even if it's not counterable and the damage isn't preventable, certain spells (misdirection or Venser) can still get to it. I used to think it'd be pretty cool if (then) future sets gave shroud to instant/sorceries, but then Time Spiral came along and Split Second outclassed that.
Posted By:
zk3
(5/13/2010 11:10:40 AM)
Metalevolence: I have a hunch Limited concerns are part of why mythic isn't all high-story-profile cards. (Note to WotC: Aren't you afraid you're giving Limited TOO much attention?)
Posted By:
SkyknightXi
(2/3/2012 12:27:51 PM)
Flavorful card is flavorful! 5/5
Posted By:
dberry02
(11/8/2010 10:43:14 PM)
"THEY CANCELLED FIREFLY?!?!?"
Posted By:
car2n
(3/14/2014 9:17:25 PM)
I love this thing, in the deck it came with, without changing it at all I've finished someone off with a kicked one of these twice. And the artwork is amazing, although the old one showed the (very) awesome Titan Engine I like this one more.
Posted By:
JanusAurelius
(2/10/2012 11:07:29 AM)