Squadron Hawk
x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 4.191 / 5  (191 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
<< <  5, 6, 7, 8, 9 >
I had the potential to create a combo deck with my sealed pool at the prerelease using 3 of these and Mass Polymorph. I didn't do it. That will always be the tourney opportunity that got away :P
Report Abuse  
Posted By: izzet_guild_mage (7/13/2010 10:27:37 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Keeper of the Nine Gales wants to know what you're doing after you rotate out of Standard. Maybe you can go and take your friends over to his place. . .

How this card became anything to write home about in a format with Scattershot Archer completely eludes me.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: DacenOctavio (5/7/2012 9:53:00 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


The only reason why Squadron Hawk is seeing play is because of the swords . .
Strength of the creature doesn't matter anymore as long as you have access to the swords . .
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Hoonster (4/24/2011 1:15:39 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Well it's a lot better than Daru Cavalier and the rest of that cycle. Seems fairly powerful, and a good way to get a lot of creatures without having to draw for them all. I imagine it would be pretty funny to topdeck later on, too. "I play three Squadron Hawks."

All in all: Not that special, but a pretty good filler creature.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: littlebeast (7/15/2010 6:51:29 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I would rather see them as 1/2s (or 2/1s if you want to make them really powerful), but not terrible cards I guess.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: VirtueVsVice (7/8/2010 5:04:19 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This card is very overpowered in Standard. It's pure card advantage for 2 mana including having a flying blocker and making Jace say "0: draw three cards". If the DCI was going to ban one card in Standard, it would be Squadron Hawk just because of how it too easily and conveniently fuels so many decks; god forbid if they ever reprint this card; this card should have been at least 3 mana for what it does.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: jonb86 (5/19/2011 12:32:58 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Definitely should have been names seekhawk.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: zidanemaxout (9/13/2010 8:26:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Too bad the art sucks. Otherwise I'd be putting it into my Bird Soldiers. I hope Wizards makes some Aven's that don't suck one day.
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Drewsel (6/4/2011 4:54:18 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Guess who's baaaack.......
Report Abuse  
Posted By: Annoyingblueplayer (8/5/2011 9:15:35 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Troutz white dose not get a version of every good blue,black,red and green card so why should they get a version of this?
Report Abuse  
Posted By: dragonking987 (4/23/2011 9:47:38 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 




We have updated our privacy policy. Click the link to learn more.

Gatherer works better in the Companion app!

Continue