I agree with Mudbutt_on, the fact that this is actully a creature and thus can be usefull in most situations makes this card much less likely to be a dead draw.
Posted By:
Silverware
(10/24/2010 10:47:58 PM)
^^DISAGREED!
This one provides creature agro that is a KNIGHT.
Posted By:
Mudbutt_on
(8/20/2010 6:49:37 PM)
Knighthood is much better.
Posted By:
mrredhatter
(10/2/2009 3:09:42 PM)
Knighthood is better in a deck with wraths and large creatures. This is better for aggro.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(4/14/2011 4:10:21 PM)
Going in Battlecry deck!
Posted By:
TreeTrunkMaster
(5/27/2011 2:53:35 PM)
If you're looking at this card, the obvious answer is to have a playset of this and Knighthood, but never in the same 60. This is what sideboards are for.
On a different note- why the heck does a KNIGHT with FIRST STRIKE not get a horse?!
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(8/7/2011 1:40:42 AM)
Made a black and white deck using this guy and a bunch of deathtouchers
Posted By:
Combolulz
(12/23/2011 12:58:19 PM)
Or you could just run Kinsbaile Cavalier over both Knighthood and this. The artwork isn't as grand and epic though.
Posted By:
igniteice
(1/17/2012 2:29:47 PM)
I don't like how on these older cards on gatherer, you can hardly read their text because the image is so shitty. If it wasn't headlined on the top of the page, I'd have no idea what this guy's name is
Posted By:
pedrodyl
(12/29/2012 8:25:10 PM)
That is some rather colorful armor those guys are sporting, "colorful" being a polite way of saying gaudy as all hell.
Posted By:
N3wtn
(1/1/2014 5:42:53 PM)