There are no comments yet for this card.
saw a darksteel sentinel with this card at prerelease. A 3/3 Vigilence Indestructible Infect! (But it was weird that darksteel sentinel ended up in an infect deck to begin with)
Posted By:
bri_boomer
(1/30/2011 12:54:16 AM)
Am I the only one who follows WoTC columns on cards? What I am getting at is this: "It deals damage to creatures in the form of -1/-1 counters AND to players in the form of poison counters." So, let's put this in a red or blue deck with Prodigal Sorcerer or Cunning Sparkmage since you will take a poison counter since I am dealing damage to a PLAYER and you you have one major threat deck, since you have the red to burn, if needed, the blue to counter, and the black to destroy things. Its called "RUB" deck and people will not like it, I am sure; but if people do like it, let me know. The down side is yes, it is an Aura which can be destroyed, but if you make the deck right, you won't have to worry about your things as much. I am just saying all this as a personal opinion and as a casual/Standard player.
Posted By:
Kami_Kira12485
(4/26/2011 3:30:02 PM)
*Sigh* If we were going to use infect we'd already be using infect. This card is handy, but...
Ugh. So pointless.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(3/7/2012 8:33:29 AM)
Iz Haz Infect
Posted By:
MasterOfEtherium
(4/18/2011 10:26:29 PM)
Poopy.
I can't think of any reason to run this.
This is the sort of card that exists because the design is expected, rather than because the design is needed.
Posted By:
HairlessThoctar
(1/27/2011 4:41:42 PM)
Bloodfire Colossus with a Safe Passage or Balefire Dragon
Posted By:
PinkleDadandy
(4/25/2012 2:25:07 PM)
Compleat? COMPLEAT?! What the hell, Wizards? Spell-check your cards before you release them!
Posted By:
Saxophonist
(10/1/2011 7:23:12 AM)
Strictly better than tainted strike.
Posted By:
MrDandyLion
(1/30/2011 11:40:04 AM)
I would have expected more out of a card called "phyresis," as the process of becoming Phyrexian is supposed to make one STRONGER, isn't it?
Posted By:
Mata-nui3
(1/27/2011 6:39:43 PM)
Would have been great as cantrip.
Because it's no cantrip it's a very very timmy-ish card with little to zero playability.
Posted By:
Vividice
(1/28/2011 11:05:10 AM)