If by vanilla you mean savage in limited (and possibly type II, considering these guys' creature type).
Posted By:
auriscope
(7/7/2011 9:27:09 PM)
They are not "kids" I actually looked up the art, and not only are they not children, they are also very scary looking. You guys shouldn't make fun of them.
Being the weirdo I am, I like to associate the numbers with the card images... there are two ways I've imagined this particular one: Male vampire is roaming around looking for a meal, once he sees it (bloodthirst trigger) he decides to bring his loving wife with him (the additional +2). Another thing may be they're roaming the swamps and feel rather malnourished, (both vampires, represented by one power and toughness each prior to the bloodthirst trigger) yet when they see the next meal they both become twice as feral and violent as they were.
I haven't actually played this card yet, but I imagine I will soon. The card seems really good for it's cost, and the art is amazing, I'm using it for my desktop wallpaper right now.
Posted By:
Necrokeryx
(8/8/2011 3:16:31 PM)
Thriller~Thriller Night~
Posted By:
RikerBlake
(7/16/2011 3:08:46 PM)
I'd rather cast a Sangromancer, but not bad.
Posted By:
Deco_y
(7/7/2011 9:54:32 PM)
This card is a bomb in limited. Constructed? Not so much.
Posted By:
GrimjawxRULES
(7/11/2011 4:50:48 AM)
This is laughable when compared to, say, a vampire nighthawk. As long as bloodlord of vaasgoth is around to save the day, i suppose all is forgiveable.
Posted By:
ObsceneMartyr
(7/21/2011 4:25:27 PM)
They were "cast out" by the Zendikar vampires because of how much they suck by comparison.
Posted By:
RisingSeraph
(7/31/2011 10:05:11 PM)
Not a fan.
Posted By:
Hayw00d0909
(7/8/2011 8:19:42 PM)
Inquisitors Flail and Gruesome Deformity + Any other buffing vampires in deck = Lifelink from hell.
Posted By:
XxDegallaxX
(11/2/2011 9:35:32 AM)