There are no comments yet for this card.
I fell in Love with 'Living Weapon' the day I saw the first spoiler about it.
But this is card is so bad... I have no clue how you could destroy such a great Idea with such crappy cards.
Posted By:
Vividice
(1/28/2011 7:37:26 AM)
If it was rare, it would be equip 4.
What is the matter?
There ARE destroy artifact spells, counterspells and blockers.
This is just so annoying. Why not 5 equip cost?
At 6, you might as well cast Massacre Wurm from the same set, to an likely greater effect.
1 for the art.
I was going to reduce the rating because they published a 3 cmc equipment that equips for 4 with added bonuses, but...
The art is THAT good and I forgot it is a 0 already, without the art.
Posted By:
Frostraven
(5/10/2012 4:27:10 PM)
I'm convinced, with 6 mana, you could give any given infect creature MUCH better than +2/+2 and flying. There is no excuse for this. Just play Rage Reflection or Beastmaster Ascension instead, and watch them actually fear your threats instead of Pistus Striking it.
Posted By:
Dr.Pingas
(10/29/2011 9:49:31 AM)
I understand about Infect and Limited. Really, I do- it has powerful potential there...
would an equip cost of 5 been too good,really? I'm honestly afraid of 4-in Infect World, this cannot be allowedto equip for 4. but 5, surely might be better than either 4 or 6, development wise?
Something that would allow it to shine be playable outside of Infect would have been nice. Ornithopter with a Bonesplitter is better.
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(1/11/2012 10:40:08 PM)
Tinwing.
Posted By:
HuntingDrake
(5/14/2013 12:29:22 AM)
Much, much better than it seems. A 2/2 for four mana is acceptable though unexciting, but he's colorless, so feel free to play this puppy in your green deck.
The six mana to equip is prohibitive, until you actually do it on your random 3/3 and create almost a shivan dragon.
Of course it is too expensive to see play in constructed, but whatever. Not all of us are tournament players.
Posted By:
Shiizu
(9/15/2013 3:40:48 AM)
So I guess the equip cost is justified because of "limited". What a lame excuse to make a card nearly unplayable in constructed. Your already overpaying for a 2/2 flyer, and then you got to pay the ridiculous equip cost because "its too good in limited". Last time I checked, Wind Drake didn't see constructed play.
Screw limited! Your logic is the reason why grey ogres and hill giants trash-pile my booster packs.
@ GrimjawxRULES
The problem I have is the huge difference in powerlevel between "limited fillers" and "constructed worthy". Like this could have had equip cost reduced by 3 and it wouldnt see constructed play.... for real... But yet you still defend the system?
Not everycard needs to be an all star, but why print garbage like this? Only going to get played 1 time in the stupid limited money sink draft, and then going to get thrown away or given out or just collecting dust in a big box....
I mean if the powerlevel was increased (STILL NOT CONSTRUCTED WO... (see all)
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(11/16/2013 5:39:06 PM)