at first i was like... HADOUKEN THATS COOL
then i realized it was a flamethrower :(
Posted By:
dontmess17
(10/30/2011 1:25:59 PM)
yea, you'll need a flamethrower to take on all the monsters of innistrad...
Posted By:
Arachibutyrophobia
(9/23/2011 8:58:03 PM)
This is what happens when Luigi's vaccum is on the frits.
All stupid jokes aside,
He's awesome, just too flippin' expensive.
Posted By:
infernox10
(9/22/2011 8:31:10 PM)
This paired with a Balefire Dragon equals one really overcooked opponent lying in a burning field of flaming cards.
Posted By:
NecroticNobody
(10/1/2011 9:02:34 PM)
Horrendously overcosted. A 2/4 would have been playable.
Posted By:
blindthrall
(10/10/2011 3:19:26 PM)
The joke is kinda forced, but I suppose it isn't too bad.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(5/9/2012 9:10:19 AM)
Am I the only person who hates this guy for flavor reasons? The entire thing is a ridiculous stretch to me. They said they didn't want big flashy fireballs and such 'cause it wouldn't fit, but a flamethrower does? Seriously? "No but its run by ghosts so it's fine." Yeah, but no, it's not. And the flavor text? Cheesey as all heck... Just so bad.
Posted By:
JanusAurelius
(1/8/2012 12:12:40 AM)
@Sleazebag
Unless the boardwipe only kills off some of your creatures, Rage Thrower would fall as well alongside them. Once the spell resolves, all the creatures are removed simultaneously, eliminating the chance for him to use the ability. He also needs to be alive in order to use the ability. So that's why if someone burns him, he can't activate the ability because the spell resolved first on the stack.
Posted By:
Travis44
(3/21/2012 1:46:52 PM)
Should really have something like "when another creature never targeted by rage thrower's ability this turn dies, rage thrower deals 2 damage to target creature or player".
Posted By:
burntup
(11/15/2011 4:40:30 AM)
Geistflame tank, huh?
Posted By:
Gelzo
(9/22/2011 4:07:38 PM)