x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.047 / 5  (86 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12345 >
Keeper of the Dead! Why are you back? Why are you burning things?
Posted By: Kryptnyt (1/26/2012 6:40:35 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


removal is at a premium in draft and this is no exception. a high pick and one of the best commons in the set. insane art too.
Posted By: SugarMill (3/3/2012 3:11:11 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Any removal that you can flashback is worth something in limited. Still, even in that format, flashback is barely a redeeming feature. If it cost one less to cast, one less to flashback and flashbacked in red, it would be much nice. Shame about the art, it could have gone on a much nicer card.

This card has actually won me a couple of limited games.
Posted By: franconbean (3/1/2012 5:35:12 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Like Burning Oil, I like that this is direct card advantage. I don't like that the flashback cost is so expensive. 2/5
Posted By: dingophone (3/29/2012 6:12:35 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


There's a lot of things that could've made this card more... vampire-like.

The colours are all there (Red and Black), so why isn't this more Vampire-y?
The art features a vampire (right?): what's the problem?

If so, maybe it could gain you life as well, like Sorin's Thirst.

It would fit into the player-targetable version of that with Flashback, which, although more costly, can be played again.

Regardless, the damage is done, and there's nothing we can do about it. 1.5/5. I'd rather play Geistflame or Burning Oil.

Posted By: Ferlord (4/23/2012 10:17:56 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I don't get why people are quite so anti- this card. Yes, it isn't the best, but it is a reuseable shock. Quite a lot of creatures in the block are 1- or 2-toughness, so this acts as removal. It can also push through the final two points you need to win the game. And it's an instant.

Not first pick, but certainly not as useless as many of you seem to think.
Posted By: Eddie_Antilles (6/4/2012 6:17:09 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Hey look its Lady Gaga =D

Honestly it helped me out in limited other than that this will never see any type of play.
Posted By: iDrunky (6/22/2012 9:07:38 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This card is so bad. I actually expected a lower rating.

3 mana for 2 damage? If the normal casting cost was better, it would be really good. Like 2 mana for 2 damage instant with 6 mana flashback. I'd try that out. At 3 mana, this is just terrible.
Posted By: SAUS3 (6/19/2013 6:21:27 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Why oh why couldn't this and Bump in the Night have had cheaper flashback costs?
Posted By: zinliah (1/26/2012 5:15:43 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@majinara. A) Your comments on every card suck. B) So does your math.
Posted By: swords_to_exile (1/31/2012 9:47:36 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0