x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 1.392 / 5  (83 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12345 >
WIZARDS! That's a heinous pun. The Latin name of the horse is "equus". So it's literally Aquus Equus.
Posted By: Nucleon (9/25/2012 3:09:58 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Staff of Zegon, eat your heart out
Posted By: Kryptnyt (1/13/2013 3:10:23 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This sucks.
Posted By: adverecundiam (9/28/2012 7:05:52 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Comparable to Wilderness Hypnotist, another bafflingly bad card. Here, the initial cost is slightly less prohibitive and we have to pay THREE FRIGGIN MANA to activate this ability, in exchange for being able to target any color creature. GARBAGE. I'm gonna go punch something now.
Posted By: greatspearman (10/11/2012 4:50:35 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I feel like this desperately wants Islandwalk...
Posted By: Demento_Recraves (9/26/2012 1:49:43 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This is a simic card. The reason it costs so much is that it's versatile!

Make your own creature able to evolve with something weaker than the creature's current power, or mess with your opponent during a combat.

Expensive? Yes. But simic has green for ramping so it shouldn't be that big of a deal.
Posted By: Neko--kun (1/28/2013 10:40:46 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I am sick of people commenting on the rarity of a card and why it is too good or bad. I would much rather see bad cards be more rare.

FYI. Common does not equal bad. Rare does not equal good.
Posted By: P-Slice (12/28/2012 6:25:34 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


For some reason Wizards keeps giving Blue -X/-0 abilities.
Somebody tell them, nobody wants it.
"Did it really have to be a tap ability?" - Second.
Posted By: Spartan_X (9/27/2012 4:05:58 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Did it really have to be a tap ability?
Posted By: Ghostmyth (9/26/2012 6:06:13 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Horrible card. I do not get why it's an uncommon. I guess there have to be crappy uncommons too. Four mana for 1/3 is just horrible, and the ability costs far too much mana to be of good use. Even in a draft I'd skip this thing. 0.5
Posted By: majinara (9/26/2012 12:18:46 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 




We have updated our privacy policy. Click the link to learn more.

Gatherer works better in the Companion app!

Continue