It's not every day you see a Magic card with a cheap motion blur in the art.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(11/20/2012 11:47:39 PM)
smoking is...not allowed...on any delta flight
Posted By:
dubtacular
(11/24/2012 6:50:17 AM)
Is this supposed to be Jennifer Meyen? http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/feature/225d looks just like her!
Posted By:
lorendorky
(12/11/2012 12:23:20 AM)
Strictly sassier than Power Sink.
Posted By:
BrickMouse
(12/20/2012 1:18:32 PM)
This is a strong counter teamed up with Dissipate. So niche on turn 2, take out there important or drop and make it gone for good. Plus its not a dead draw late game, unlike mana leak.
Call me crazy, but this is my favorite card of the block so far.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(12/21/2012 6:31:00 AM)
Soooooooooooooo great when you pla a deck with 4 Arcane Melee and 4 Goblin Electromancer
Posted By:
Casey130
(1/3/2013 10:17:02 PM)
Pair this up with Guttersnipe and Goblin Electromancers.
If you have one RU Electromancer you're dropping a single U pay one to dodge spell with at least one mana ready to tap.
If you have a --R Guttersnipe you have an Izzet charm that will deal two damage to your opponent.
Add the two together and you're probably talking a single U pay one to dodge spell that deals two damage at the very least.
And the more of those goblin bastards you have the more this thing hurts.
Late game when mana leak's set mana cost to dodge has become a bit of a flop this thing is still hurting people.
Posted By:
Odee
(1/28/2013 3:28:30 AM)
It does not provide as much raw power as Mana Leak and it isn't as reliable late game as Dissipate, but nonetheless it is a really good card to have up on turn two, considering how often they will be tapping out for any card that they play on turn two. It's especially nice against matchups such as Bant Hexproof, where if you don't counter their Invisible Stalker early you won't be able to deal with him at all for several turns.
4/5
Posted By:
Tamerlein
(7/18/2013 4:17:55 PM)
Floorsweeper, wouldn't you still have to pay at least "1U"? Because if you just pay U and X is 0, then your opponent can counter the spell by just declaring he taps 0 mana. It's technically correct.
Not saying counter and exiling for 1U isn't awesome, but paying just U doesn't seem like it would work.
Posted By:
Galf506
(1/4/2014 5:55:59 AM)
With art like that, flavor text needs to be by Dikembe Mutombo
Posted By:
purplebackpack89
(5/17/2014 8:33:43 AM)