x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 1.214 / 5  (63 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
123 >
Hmm, if it had a good upside to it then I would think of things to combo with it but a 3/3 for 4 isn't really worth thinking about for trying to fix it. Hell, if you want some type of good creature for 4 in white just use calciderm, you don't need to have other cards to make that creature good.
Posted By: Tommy9898 (6/12/2010 6:56:22 PM)


It combos with Flaring Pain!
Posted By: ScissorsLizard (12/15/2009 12:47:16 AM)


Combos with Zedruu, sorta-ish. Yah, I got nothing.
Posted By: TPmanW (11/3/2011 5:04:37 PM)


Because 3/3 creatures for 4 are just too powerful... and this is a rare!
Posted By: Radagast (7/21/2011 6:46:21 AM)



Back when I got into Magic again a bit over a year ago, I perused Gatherer to check out what people said about the old sets from my "first era".

I was pretty shocked how horribad most of Ice age had become. Especially the rares.

And this dude... Is the epitome.

Would have been really usable at {1}{W}, but like this, it's a Hill Giant with a downside at RARE.

Just imagine getting an Ice Age booster today and drawing THIS...
Posted By: Lord_of_Tresserhorn (3/7/2012 5:01:44 AM)


Envying Hill Giant is a lousy place to be.
Posted By: Sutebe (7/6/2012 6:30:04 PM)


Flavorful. Efficiently costed p/t for its time in white. Still absolutely horrible.
Posted By: r-e-meatyard (12/18/2009 4:47:42 PM)


This is almost as bad as Ignoble Soldier.
Posted By: Bouchart (10/23/2009 6:31:43 PM)


A way to use him is to attack with him first and hope your opponent will spend his mana on it so that you can safely cast your spells, but a smart opponent wouldn't do that if he doesn't have any other way of taking care of your spells.
Posted By: Daikoru (9/8/2010 6:21:45 PM)


I can't think of a combo.
Posted By: mrredhatter (10/3/2009 2:19:32 PM)