x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.348 / 5  (33 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
No risk, no reward.
Posted By: HairlessThoctar (3/9/2010 4:40:47 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


A 4/4 flyer for 5 isn't so bad by itself, but with the potential to be 6/6, this thing can really beat down. Being black keeps it out of reach from a lot of removal, but it's still pretty risky.
Posted By: Auteur (8/24/2010 2:30:02 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


P1: ALRIGHT! My Vamp is ONLINE B*TCHEZ! I may be at 6 life with no more creatures but that Repay in Kind means you are DEAD! YEAH!
P2: Go for the Throat.
P1: ...I'm going to stop buying Judgment packs.
Posted By: Shadoflaam (3/27/2011 9:22:07 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This card isn't bad at all? Threshold and you get a 6/6 flyer, normally a 4/4. And if your worried about losing him and taking six, just attack till you lose threshold. You'll do more damage than you risk taking for sure.
Posted By: Omenchild (2/13/2010 3:08:49 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


A 4/4 flier isn't bad in of itself, but this card just seems way too risky and self defeating for my tastes. If I'm going to be aggressive with black I'll just play Sengir Vampire.
Posted By: RPGfan (2/1/2013 1:51:03 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


As a rare, this would suck big time, and I could definitely see them printing this as a rare in Judgment. But the fact that this is an uncommon is what makes this a good, or even great card.
Posted By: The_Murderauder (7/2/2013 3:58:28 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0