Well, I think "Big Mill" spells are going to be difficult to see ''New" versions of, but I wouldn't say they're "uninteresting" :) I just think they'll be 'neat- more Mill stuff!' :)
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(1/25/2013 8:02:31 PM)
Not to sound stupid but to be corrected on this please the card states that "each opponent" so if I were to cast this card does it apply to me as well or just other players because technically I'm an opponent to the other player and it says each opponent?
Posted By:
cmccue48
(6/12/2013 7:11:25 PM)
I agree with Milez. Is there some sort of broken combo with playing this card for nothing? The art reminds me a bit of the album art for Lateralus by TOOL.
Posted By:
lorendorky
(1/22/2013 4:28:34 PM)
Thinking is overrated anyway.
Posted By:
Purplerooster
(1/23/2013 6:57:25 PM)
I'd think that x cannot be zero because revealing 0 lands is undefined. how would you tell if you will reveal no land if it doesn't stop because it has to check whether 0 is revealed. The other way I would see it is it will mill nothing due to the fact it reached 0 land before revealing land. Oh, and how do you reveal nothing?
Posted By:
Oatbran
(1/24/2013 8:05:50 AM)
"So, how many lands do you run in your deck?"
Posted By:
Smoke_Stack
(1/24/2013 9:41:44 AM)
Somehow integrate this into a copy/mana-ramp deck...
Nahhhh, just stick with typical Dimir.
Posted By:
handoflazav_414
(1/24/2013 4:53:00 PM)
This is going to find a nice little home in my Ally mill deck. Dropping this on T3 with infinite mana from Harabaz Druid and Freed From The Real is going to be ridiculous. Instantly deck the entire table.
Posted By:
JadedTemplar
(1/25/2013 8:32:47 PM)
even if X could be zero it wouldn't matter because they would just reveal zero cards.
Posted By:
Arachibutyrophobia
(1/26/2013 7:45:59 PM)
When everyone's playing fetchlands and Terramorphic Expanses. And you play this. O the joy!
Posted By:
pedrodyl
(1/26/2013 10:39:32 PM)