I had two at the pre-release today. I mainboarded them since few people played red. They won me two games (especially when equipped with Fireshrieker)!!
Of course, no one would play this beyond limited, but remember the drawback is almost non-existent if you are attacking with a 3-power unblockable creature each turn!
Posted By:
Lord_of_Tresserhorn
(7/13/2013 9:07:54 AM)
I don't care if cyclops tribal is coming up. Cards should be balanced unto themselves. I get the flavor of his one angry eye not being able to see things that are small but I think we would all be better served if he would have been a 4/3 for 4R. He would have been an ok common in that case. Then again... maybe they get a giggle out of reading our complaints on these forums.
Posted By:
Phelplan
(7/23/2013 12:55:35 AM)
Overcosted by one. If they fixed that, it would be a solid common. Better than a few of the uncommons in the set as it is.
Posted By:
NoobOfLore
(9/25/2013 1:16:01 AM)
Wow... This is um... Overcosted by 2
Posted By:
ThisisSakon
(7/9/2013 5:27:58 PM)
Even without the drawback, this is a terrible card. That says something.
Posted By:
Pendulous
(7/9/2013 3:45:21 PM)
Oh, I get it! He can't notice the small thing!
Shoulda at least cosed less for the drawback. maybe {1}{R}{R}?
Posted By:
DaLucaray
(7/9/2013 3:35:58 PM)
WHY
Posted By:
Goatllama
(7/9/2013 8:03:56 PM)
I would play one in my draft deck if I was pressed for playables.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(7/10/2013 6:26:35 AM)
Look at that thing... LOOK AT IT. Its freaking terrifying.
How does it die to Stonehorn Chanter?
Posted By:
leingodf8
(7/12/2013 2:04:15 AM)
Why is this so bad? lol they could have easily made this at least a little better. 5 mana would still be bad, but at least it would be better than this.
Posted By:
SAUS3
(7/12/2013 9:28:05 AM)