Two mana for a 2/3 with regeneration and is a creature from a relevant tribe at common? Holy crap!
Posted By:
RamenAwesome
(10/11/2013 2:41:39 PM)
...Wait, is this a solid, common Red creature?
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(11/16/2013 5:02:44 PM)
I keep seeing people describe this as a bad card, but deathtouch and combat tricks aside, there are very few commons that can block it without trading for less than 5 mana, and not even that many uncommon either
Posted By:
Circeus
(12/7/2013 5:39:58 PM)
Really good, yet balanced and common worthy. It is a bone thrown to pauper players and anyone who wants to buy some packs but not overspend.
Posted By:
Phelplan
(12/19/2013 1:56:02 PM)
Not sure how limited is going to play, but this is either going to be VERY good or VERY bad. I don't see it finding a middle ground.
Posted By:
.Blaze.
(9/17/2013 3:40:20 PM)
this could play a key role in minotaur tribal, if that becomes a thing
Posted By:
Arachibutyrophobia
(9/17/2013 10:19:07 PM)
Nice draft deck of all 2/2 bears.
Posted By:
Purplerooster
(9/18/2013 3:39:46 PM)
Not only helps make minotaur tribal a thing, but it's pretty good!
Posted By:
blurrymadness
(9/19/2013 12:14:44 PM)
Sick art.
Posted By:
LordOfTheFlies87
(9/19/2013 5:32:29 PM)
This was very good for me at the prerelease. Very few 1-drops were played, so when I cast this on turn 2 when I played first, it put pressure on opponents early. Opponents either traded valuable utility creatures with it or spent answers on it, leaving them with fewer answers for my bomb creatures (Ember Swallower and Mistcutter Hydra). The regeneration was never relevant, but it could have been if I'd been in B/R instead of R/G.
It's a very good common for sealed and a solid early pick in draft. But unless B/R minotaurs becomes viable later in the block and wants a steady 2-drop, it won't see competitive constructed play.
Posted By:
Powercat
(9/22/2013 7:36:05 AM)