As much as I want to like this card, I can't help be feel totally ripped off.
The bump to mythic status and addition of 4 more colors should warrant more of an upgrade over Celestial Archon than just vigilance, trample, lifelink and a change from one irrelevant creature type to another equally irrelevant one. This doesn't feel truly mythic or 5-colored to me.
Posted By:
lordof1000mimes
(3/15/2014 1:54:13 AM)
Is it wrong that I want to use this with Soul Foundry and maybe Power Artifact?
Posted By:
birikin
(3/26/2014 10:23:04 AM)
Ok, who let the Pokémon guy into the room to name this card???
The name reminds me of an older card - Chromium.
I may try this in my five color artifact deck. Imagine a little Alloy Myr suddenly boosted +4/+4 with flying, first strike, vigilance, trample and lifelink...
Posted By:
Daikonos
(3/31/2014 12:52:22 PM)
Now I can't stop imagining a yoked ox riding on a manticore.
Posted By:
Arachnos
(5/1/2014 8:07:50 AM)
My local game store community and I wish this was legendary so we could play it as a commander (Because why not). Though, I believe Wizards did not want to have to deal with the rules complications between a legendary creature bestowed upon by a non-creature legendary with the same name (Though they probably just didn't have enough room in the typeline). Though that is an interesting interaction that should be analyzed.
"704.5k If a player controls two or more legendary permanents with the same name, that player chooses one of them, and the rest are put into their owners' graveyards. This is called the 'legend rule'."
Note that the rule doesn't care about whether or not the permanents are of the same type, only that they have the same name. What does this mean if this rule comes up (If, say, one of the players is using Leyline of Singularity)? You have a Chromanticore on the battlefield and get the ingenious idea to best... (see all)
Posted By:
Syrtees
(5/11/2014 4:36:23 AM)
If this isn't based off of Nyan Cat I'll quit magic.
Posted By:
WarioMan
(5/12/2014 2:40:07 PM)