Or Vampiric Tutor, which costs 2 less and is an instant.
Posted By:
Ideatog
(2/18/2010 10:45:32 PM)
Grim Tutor, one of its many contemporaries, is far better in almost every occasion.
Posted By:
Auteur
(8/24/2010 2:51:29 PM)
Amazing that this card isn't rated higher. Especially considering they're about $15, but I know a big part of that is due to their rarity (not just being a rare, but also from portal).
This is not the worst searcher, 2 life is trivial, the only part I dislike is not getting it your hand right away. Then again, you draw it and can cast it 4th turn while you would still be searching for it with Diabolic Tutor, so not too shabby.
I want some for my {U}{B} Battle of Wits deck, that deck needs many searchers :P
4/5
Posted By:
TreeTrunkMaster
(4/18/2011 1:52:52 PM)
Worst universal tutor ever. 5/5
Posted By:
MisterAction
(7/1/2012 2:42:32 AM)
this card does not compare to diabolic tutor. and that card is type 2 right now
Posted By:
mkniffen
(8/21/2009 10:12:41 PM)
I had a teacher who looked JUST like this.
Posted By:
ClockworkSwordfish
(3/1/2010 6:16:20 PM)
Diabolic Tutor's little bro. Useful if you need a card, but not right now, and have some life to waste.
Posted By:
Test-Subject_217601
(9/10/2010 5:26:04 PM)
Great card, wish they would reprint this card, far more balanced, without being terrible, then the other tutors.
Posted By:
Callipsa
(11/4/2009 9:50:33 AM)
The only drawback I see is that the card sits through your opponents turn on top of your library unless you can pay for a card draw during your own turn, but if you can then Diabolic Tutor is better.
Posted By:
tavaritz
(7/11/2011 2:16:17 PM)
Tutors are always good.
Posted By:
Axelle
(7/26/2011 1:49:11 PM)