I gotta agree with Orza, this card isn't this great. I used to own a few back when Tempest was still fairly recent-ish, and I gotta say, it rarely even got put into a deck. You'd think it was kinda good and try, but one extra mana for one turn really isn't that much unless you've got something really special that absolutely needs to be in play NOW.
Probably some crappy first-turn-kill cheese that you got off the internet and spent a paycheck or two on that nobody wants to hear about or play against you with.
I will never understand competitive magic unless it's for big money.
Posted By:
Dr.Pingas
(7/12/2011 11:46:52 PM)
I got a playset of these from my friend for 2 Yamabushi's flames and some llanlowar elves. I win.
Posted By:
CatsAreCthala
(2/4/2010 7:40:57 PM)
Still a great card. Not too powerful that they can't reprint it. You listening wizards?..
Posted By:
apocalypsecq
(2/11/2009 1:40:03 PM)
wait this is common?
Posted By:
Th3_Dark_On3
(5/27/2009 4:55:48 PM)
I got a playset of these from a 30 pound box of MTG that I bought for a hundred bucks along with a HUGE FREAKIN STACK OF RARES! Like seriously a 10 inch tall stack of rares. And like a eight hundred commons and four hundred uncommons. I finally have a substantial collection. :D I love Magic!
Posted By:
EvilCleavage
(5/24/2010 8:41:46 PM)
Greatest Common Next To Rancor
Posted By:
MasterOfEtherium
(7/15/2009 10:57:12 PM)
WHAT? This was only common?
Posted By:
JFM2796
(8/1/2011 7:07:49 AM)
lol this has higher ratting then the black lotus.
Posted By:
dragonking987
(11/3/2010 3:48:50 PM)
"Hard to imagine," mused Hanna, stroking the petal, "such a lovely card is common!"
Posted By:
Paolino
(10/7/2011 3:13:18 AM)
it's a little sad that this card has a higher rating than black lotus it's self
Posted By:
marwinshieldscale
(6/12/2012 9:22:22 PM)