I have an annoying player in my group who loves to animate everyone's lands (usually with Natural Affinity) and then nuke them all with Pyroclasm. He doesn't seem to run any artifact hate though... This is perfect.
Posted By:
Totema
(6/18/2013 12:44:31 AM)
I find "damage marked" unusual wording in the oracle. Since when is that in the official lexicon?
Also, terribad card. If you have problems with ld, run terra eternal or darksteel citadel. Possibly also wind zendikon. If you have $$ you're probably already running crucible of worlds. Also, some white land replaces itself when it dies, I think.
Posted By:
patronofthesound
(6/18/2013 10:23:52 AM)
Great card if you're running an Urzatron or Cloudpost deck, you can easily have this artifact out by turn 3.
Posted By:
Cujucuyo
(9/5/2013 8:22:27 PM)
The new wording replaces destruction with damage prevention.
If the land is not creature then damage prevention doesn't apply, but the land is not destroyed because the destruction was replaced by damage prevention.
If the land is a creature then the damage prevention handles if the land would be destroyed because of damage greater or equal to the lands toughness and straight destruction is prevented because destruction was replaced by damage prevention.
The reason for this instead of gaining inestructability is because there is no neat way to template temporal indestructability otherways. If one uses Stone Rain to destroy a land one can pay 
and prevent the lands destuction, but if the player follows that with an other LD-spell one has to pay again. To still have this same effect the card is worded in Oracle the way that it is.
Posted By:
tavaritz
(1/15/2014 6:26:47 PM)
F***in' Yard Imps.......
Posted By:
Goatllama
(5/12/2014 7:14:17 AM)