x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.408 / 5  (38 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
It's interesting because unlike most of these Keldon Warlord variants, it's all players. Certainly better in multiplayer, and you'll need equipment or some such.

That said, people need to treat {6} much different when rating compared to {2}{G}{G}{W}{W} or something. Color limits mana production heavily. Similarly {B}{B}{B} is much different than {W}{W}{W}

Urza lands, Locus, Channel, Spoils of Evil, etc.. these are all ways to produce gobs of colorless mana by turn 2-3 (among other things), further: no color weight means you can put this in any color (well duh) meaning that {U} can get an efficient huge beater where it normally might have trouble doing so.
Posted By: blurrymadness (1/26/2013 2:42:09 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Not bad buts its more of a side deck card because you can only play it against a few decks.
Posted By: Ace8792 (7/6/2010 9:54:38 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Um, it's a 6 mana creature, with no protection or evasion or any sort of useful ability. I would rate it 4/5, its current rating, if I thought it would be a 10/10 or so every time I played it. If I expected a 6/6, I might give it a 3/5. However, I don't expect either of those. I expect a creature that is too slow to help me much against aggresive creature decks when it would be large, since it's expensive. I expect a creature that is useless against controlling decks that run few creatures - which is when you'll have time to play it. If you manage some token generation against a control deck, it might be a reasonable size, but in those cases you're probably winning or about to lose to Wrath of God anyway. I acknoledge that it might be decent in limited, but it does not deserve 4/5.
Posted By: rubber (3/7/2010 5:17:50 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It's okay...
Posted By: KokoshoForPresident (3/30/2012 4:34:30 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Great in multiplayer. For 1v1 I wouldnt run it unless I was playing swarmy, even then I might just leave it in sideboard unless its a mirror match.
Posted By: TheWrathofShane (10/24/2013 8:41:34 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0