Less Lovecraft and more Giger. But yes, this art is pretty well wasted.
Posted By:
ROBRAM89
(4/24/2011 10:36:46 AM)
Should have been a 13/13 for 13 with some insane 13-related ability. Oh well, a lost opportunity i suppose :\
Posted By:
Crag-Hack
(7/31/2011 11:30:35 PM)
How delightfully Lovecraftian.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(11/13/2010 9:03:05 PM)
Agreed, it also has excellent flavor text...
Posted By:
Guest57443454
(11/25/2009 8:22:41 PM)
The casting cost is too high.
But Mark Tedin did an awesome artwork job here.
Posted By:
Mode
(2/23/2009 4:42:17 AM)
For a name like this, I'd expect some terrifyingly huge creature with a corresponding drawback. Instead... regeneration?
Posted By:
Auteur
(1/14/2010 8:29:27 PM)
This card is just despicable. Cost BB or something instead of sacrificing a Swamp and it's pretty good, though still off-flavor.
Posted By:
SleetFox
(3/14/2010 4:24:54 PM)
This would make for a wicked tattoo other then that pretty horribad
Posted By:
storm_crow4presidnt
(4/22/2010 7:22:18 PM)
I love this card. I mean, I know it's a complete piece of garbage, but that art may just be one of my favorites from Legends.
Posted By:
Detonativity
(11/20/2010 4:08:57 PM)
the art, name, and mechanics should all be taken apart and given to different art, name, and mechanics. this doesn't look nearly big enough to be a Horror of Horrors, unless you make it a HORRIBLY Spike Effect that just plain Castrates Target Player and feeds their balls to them. :P
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(10/29/2013 10:05:43 AM)