x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 3.061 / 5  (98 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
123 >
i like my cheap exalteds with high toughness.
Posted By: davidhuman (4/26/2009 1:11:17 PM)


He has a huge sword
Posted By: brunsbr103 (11/5/2009 7:00:05 PM)


It really depends,
I use him because he is a good 2 drop with 3 toughness, surviving early threats, because most things that early won't do more than 3 damage, and serving as a temporary wall and the exalted bonus.
He is an artifact creature providing some support in times against black.
And I have a playset of foil ones so they look cool by being in their X)
Posted By: Godaime (6/1/2009 5:14:40 PM)


He's an exalted artifact creature... and I like the flavour text :3
Posted By: thopterthallid (6/29/2009 1:04:15 PM)


Posted By: axiobeta (4/23/2012 5:38:27 AM)


Very good 2-drop at common. On par with the blade cycle IMO. Swings as a 2/4 or pumps your attackers, and 3 toughness makes it much more durable than something at 2.
Posted By: asmallcat (6/18/2009 10:48:54 AM)


This card is clearly underpowered. If you can get a 1/1 creature with exalted for cmc1, why should you pay 2 mana from a different color to get a 1/3 instead ???

Compare this with Watchwolf or Qasali Pridemage.

It seems this card has to suck just because it is blue instead of green.
Posted By: Cheza (5/6/2009 12:49:08 PM)


I agree, also it is a 2 drop KNIGHT which means it ought to be 2/2 not 1/3 :(, the being a blue/white artifact exalted kinda benefits an esper deck...depending on your style of play.
Posted By: Elfwhyk (5/19/2009 4:03:43 PM)


let me see ......wtf exalted artefacts in esper sounds good but not my style of playing in esper,beter be in WU exalted deck,but that`s it not in esper,not in bant
Posted By: Iiory (7/26/2009 4:09:07 AM)


To me, if this card had high Toughness it be useful, but it's not.
Posted By: gatherer132 (11/25/2009 4:38:41 PM)