x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 3.757 / 5  (103 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
1234 >
Hello EDH gold.
Posted By: Mr.Wimples (10/12/2011 11:32:22 AM)


I'm glad to see more answers to planeswalkers in green.
Posted By: Cyberium (9/22/2011 6:17:47 PM)


I am getting 4 of this to run on my R/G Land Destruction deck... woo! It kills planeswalkers too for 4... ill take it :D
Posted By: DevourerJay (9/30/2011 4:20:12 PM)


Nice card! So ruthlessly efficient, as it should be.
Posted By: Radagast (10/3/2011 12:05:36 PM)


@ Phatima: Emblems aren't permanents. Currently, there are no cards that can interact with emblems in any way.
Posted By: Chamale (1/10/2012 10:53:34 PM)


Careful, Garruk. You seem to have use for metalworking (parts of your armor, your spearheads), and THAT'S a hallmark of civilization...

Tanaka348: I think it more likely that when the novel comes out, Garruk will get bound up in the Avacyn situation as a result of pursuing Liliana, finding himself in a classic case of Teeth-Clenched Teamwork with Sorin in order to find the best way of breaking the Veil's hold (just asking Liliana nicely probably isn't going to work), which just happens to be part and parcel of restoring a certain predator-prey dynamic on Innistrad to proper health. (Granted that Garruk might have issues on whether the predator in question is the predator that should be there in the first place, as opposed to something like baloths...)
Posted By: SkyknightXi (2/23/2012 2:04:19 PM)


Oddly, the art and flavor text seem way more fitting for a core set than Innistrad. I guess it's nice to have art function later on without getting a new one, but the flavor text changes all the time, so you don't have rip your next idea for yet another Garruk Naturalize quote and put it here.

I also find it odd that, of the two planeswalkers, Garruk is the only one to get a flavor text quote, when Liliana is the only one that has anything to do with the story at all. Garruk's just following Liliana for vengeance and has nothing to do with anything. Which, I'm not sure is a terrible thing; it reminds me of those old serials where the hero would have an arch-nemesis that would follow him around and attack during adventure.
Posted By: Tanaka348 (9/23/2011 2:50:07 PM)


Contrary to a lot of people, I'm going to say this is not strictly better than Creeping Mold, just that it's usually better. Why? Creeping Mold can target anything that is an artifact, enchantment, or land, including artifact creatures or man-lands. Bramblecrush can't touch either of those.

Of course, Bramblecrush can hit Plainswalkers, which I'd argue are more likely to be at risk of killing you than any artifact creature or man-land. Most of the time. I did say "usually better".

Bottom line: great card. If you want you can call it an update that accounts for plainswalkers, and with the way the language is written it'll handle any potential future permanent types that WotC throws at us.
Posted By: yyukichigai (1/20/2012 6:35:47 PM)


So... after they ban Jace, they print this. Thanks, Wizards.
Posted By: wstonefi (9/23/2011 9:22:36 AM)


Destroy target planeswalker/sword.
Posted By: Atogatogatog (9/23/2011 11:47:45 AM)


Gatherer works better in the Companion app!