Outdated by Boros Reckoner. I still love you Spitemare
Posted By:
flavioal28
(1/22/2013 3:33:13 PM)
@ AMart83: It is clearly a horse though. A horse made of fire, yes, but still a horse. It doesn't matter that horse isn't really a heavily supported creature type - it's a horse, it even has "-mare" at the end of it's name! Or is game mechanics the only reason for having creature types in your opinion?
Posted By:
Majora_13
(2/28/2013 12:55:32 PM)
Not that it would make any difference, but should be 'Elemental Horse' (à la Nightmare).
Posted By:
Corey_bayoudragonfly
(9/11/2011 11:36:16 AM)
You can redirect a flame slash to a player or even a Shivan Meteor
Posted By:
Hivis_of_the_Scale
(9/18/2011 8:08:54 AM)
This card is absolutely worth building a deck around: Chain Reaction, Blasphemous Act, Into the Maw of Hell, Furnace of Rath, Fire Servant, and friendly Spitebellows
Oh yeah: Pariah and Volcano Hellion FTW.
Posted By:
heavyterror
(9/27/2011 3:12:49 AM)
If you can make it indestructable, the shenanigans this guy can pull off can be devastating for the opponent. Here is one I thought of -
Skeletal Grimace - to give it regen
Alluring Scent - to force the opponents creatures to block it
Or you could either equip it with Gorgon Flail or cast Fight to the Death to destroy the opponents creatures in addition to the damage they take =)
Posted By:
MechaKraken
(7/12/2012 2:54:55 AM)
I agree w/@Corey_bayoudragonfly; they missed a chance to fix its creature type.
Posted By:
Paleopaladin
(10/9/2011 9:17:46 AM)
It's like a Stuffy Doll that's not indestructible.
Posted By:
azure_drake222222
(2/4/2013 6:02:31 PM)
It's no Mogg Fanatic, but it'll do.
Posted By:
ViashinoWizard
(5/26/2013 1:35:25 PM)