Man, creatures just used to suck.
Posted By:
oraymw
(11/7/2011 9:50:23 AM)
To think, it would be great in Green.
Posted By:
NeoKoda
(8/8/2011 4:29:10 PM)
Though it is clearly outclassed by baneslayer for a white deck, consider that you can't play baneslayer in a white/blue Urzatron kind of deck as often as you can play this.
Granted. That does NOT make this a good card by any sense of the word. This could be a common for draft and then it would be merely alright.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(2/5/2012 5:28:39 PM)
Judas Priest does not approve.
Posted By:
WyndFox
(5/25/2013 12:12:22 PM)
Hate this angel. It wasn't even good when it was printed.
Posted By:
Satuu
(6/18/2011 9:53:57 AM)
Yes, Baneslayer Angel really outranks this.
Posted By:
Weretarrasque
(7/25/2009 8:07:11 AM)
Forget Baneslayer... I would run Serra Angel over this.
Posted By:
Mudbutt_on
(12/5/2010 1:48:22 AM)
As mediocre as this card is, In combat it will still take out Baneslayer Angel.
Posted By:
themicronaut
(4/2/2010 6:35:49 PM)
Come on people, We all know Baneslayer is overpowered compared to its mana cost, and even if it wasn't, it doesn't make this a bad card. It's so sad to hear all these "there is a card that is better than this, therefore this sux" comments, don't you realize you can have only 4 baneslayers in your deck (if you're rich/lucky enough), so unless you plan on having a deck of 4 baneslayers and 56 plains, that kind of comment is just not fair. Besides, anyone can see that this is an older card, when the power to mana ratio was way different, so comparing it to beneslayer doesn't make sense. That is all.
Posted By:
Sironos
(5/27/2010 10:33:04 AM)
Since the printing of Baneslayer Angel, this card is actually pathetic...
Posted By:
Volcre
(7/14/2009 3:12:20 PM)