I concur, this card truthfully does suck. Why was this thing given a drawback, when it was already a 4/5 for six mana? Was somebody brain-dead when they thought, "hey, lets make an insignificant unplayable creature"?
Posted By:
SavageBrain89
(6/24/2009 7:57:04 PM)
The art is bland, and it is just boring all together.
Posted By:
EvilCleavage
(5/19/2010 11:37:23 AM)
Well... I think the art is cool!
Posted By:
Asic
(2/28/2010 9:39:35 PM)
This card really sucks. I don't really like this card. I just wish you create a super ultra mega rare card and make this one a super ultra mega rare card. ...A card you'll never get.... I don't know why the RND team bother to create this stupid card....
Posted By:
urbanhunter
(5/11/2009 1:44:16 AM)
reminds me of seaserpant. it may even be worse though
Posted By:
Mindbend
(5/27/2010 2:29:26 PM)
GrimjawxRULES: You answered your own question five words after you asked it. It's a 4/5 for 6 with no abilities. That's already beyond terrible. Adding a drawback onto it isn't helping anything. Compare it with, say, Frost Titan... 6/6 for 6, also in Blue, only one more coloured mana, not vulnerable to artifact destruction, a great ability, semi-shroud, no drawbacks.
Posted By:
Henrietta
(6/17/2011 4:11:34 PM)
the arts really sick one the plus side great attention to detail in the body
Posted By:
aba1
(1/2/2010 9:58:19 PM)
Wow... this is even worse than that cat guy...
*/2 I will not even waist time to say why.
Posted By:
Zoah
(1/6/2010 6:41:08 PM)
...what the... I don't see why anybody would play a 4/5 vanilla for 6cc, and this is EVEN WORSE? WTF??
Posted By:
Shiduba
(6/27/2010 7:54:21 AM)
Another card for my up-and-coming Menger sponge
Posted By:
circu196
(7/13/2010 2:21:40 PM)