x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 3.617 / 5  (128 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
1234 >
ok, this is a 5/5 flier for 6, and it wont die to its own ability, it is a strong card that should be seeing more play maybe someone will make a sac deck soon with this as the biggest bomb, true it is kinda fail in shards block, but you take it to zen, with no golds or hybrids, its usefulness skyrockets, and the effect only hurts you if you run a bunch of mono color guys
Posted By: Dingo777 (11/15/2009 10:04:07 PM)


How is red and black three colors? Colorless does not count as a color. If you know who you are playing against, and know it will be a mostly single color deck when you have a mostly multicolor, it's pretty good. Throw him in a Grixis with aforementioned Thrax, and then have them both killed but whatever it's a good idea in concept.

As for colorless...the only thing I can recall is that when one must pick a color, colorless is not a choice. So...yeah I have no idea. I'd say no, but that's just me.

edit: From this card (Ashnod's Transmogrant) it just makes me think more that colorless means that monocolor does not apply, so artifact creatures survive.
Posted By: Elysiume (5/21/2009 7:14:55 PM)


So ok obviously painters servant and this card together, although it seems easier to go with something like a flameblast dragon, which btw is a mono colored in shards of alara so no not all the cards are multi colored.
Posted By: Donovan_Fabian (11/13/2009 3:33:14 AM)


"Hey you! Yeah, you 4/4 White angel token! C'mere!"
Posted By: DoragonShinzui (5/30/2012 9:10:28 AM)


This was printed in an all gold set to force people to have multicolor creatures in play... good in black-red deck backed-up with lots of removal spells that black and red colors can offer... it can also kill indestructible mono-colored creatures such as spearbreaker behemoth due to its sacrifice effect not destroy effect...
Posted By: God_of_Destruction (6/24/2009 4:53:25 AM)


this is pretty awesome...
once hes on the table, it'd take a while for his effect to work its magic... playing this card while minimizing its effect on you would mean playing a mainly multi colored deck...

curious though if artifact creatures are considered mono-colored or not... because they are colorless, right?
Posted By: spoonish (5/5/2009 1:43:18 PM)


Huh? Was this supposed to be a joke, Wizards? Printing this guy in a MULTICOLOR-ONLY SET? That's mean. He's kinda good, actually... but not now. Too much gold around.
Posted By: True_Mumin (6/13/2009 7:45:16 PM)


Herp derp, It That Betrays :P
Posted By: izzet_guild_mage (4/27/2010 2:18:44 PM)


Hes only 6, remember that
Posted By: Omenchild (12/28/2009 11:03:45 PM)


Awwwww, it's the lit'le demon that took out a Baneslayer Angel. Don't you just love those "I think I can" storys? So now red black decks can kill the baddest creature in standard.
Posted By: wolfbear2 (10/14/2009 2:44:54 PM)